Uncategorized

Culture Matters

I was reading an article yesterday about how
bilingualism makes children smarter, by improving their cognitive skills (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/18/opinion/sunday/the-benefits-of-bilingualism.html).
I have always been proud about how all our kids grew up bilingual (my step-daughter
in German and English; the other three in English and Greek – adding German to
the mix by the time they were three years old). I am confident that one day
they will come to appreciate this gift we have given them, even if now they complain about having to go to two different schools (they go to Greek
school once a week in addition to their “regular” bilingual school) and do
their Greek homework when they have so much else going on.
For me, raising them this way is much more than wanting
to make them smarter or offer them practical advantages in their future lives
and careers. The idea that my children would learn my native language was always
a given. It was also part of a bigger “package:” I wanted them to become
familiar with my culture; to understand and appreciate where part of their
family comes from; to be proud of their Greek heritage. Eventually, I wanted
that culture to become part of their identity.
Before they were born, I read most of the literature
on raising bilingual and multilingual children (yes, I’m a nerd). I knew what
the benefits are, which methods work and what common mistakes I should avoid. This
was not going to come naturally or automatically to them. It was going to be work, but it would be well worth it. I was diligent about speaking to them only in Greek;
reading Greek books to them; insisting that we watch DVDs in Greek, instead of other
languages (my husband drew the line at dubbed Disney movies J); sending them
to Greek school once a week as soon as they turned four;
hanging out with our Greek friends and their children as much as possible. I
also wanted them to have a feel for the culture first-hand, so I took them to
Greece regularly, making sure they spent time with my family and took part in
family traditions and celebrations. I was secretly hoping that at some point they
would feel Greek, at least in part; that my home country would become their home,
too.
I knew that I had a short window of opportunity before the
other two languages took over once they were in school,
so I did my best (Sure enough, that window is rapidly closing now, as I am
noticing, to my horror, that they sometimes switch to English or German even
when they are with their Greek or half-Greek friends).
The big shock came when, a couple of years ago, I was
watching Philip and Alexia at soccer practice and the coach was trying to point
out how many different countries were represented in the group, by asking the
kids who came from each country to raise their hand. When it was Greece’s turn,
neither of them raised their hand (they did for Austria)! Somehow I did not see
it coming. We had a long talk afterwards and I tried to explain to them
about their bicultural heritage; that, despite what they might think, they are half-Greek. It became clear that,
while my children understand very well that I
am Greek, it did not occur to them that they are as well. They are always happy
to go visit and at some point even told me that they would have liked to live in
Greece, but their attachment to the culture is very different from mine and
always will be. It is a strange feeling, but one that I need to come to terms
with and be happy for whatever “Greekness” they do have from me.
Soon after we decided to move to Zurich, one of my
first priorities – besides finding a home and schools for the kids – has been
to find a Greek school for them. I want them to at least have a once-a-week,
formal contact with the language and with the culture. I have not been able to
locate such a school yet, but I’m working on it. The Greek school here in
Vienna has been very much part of their weekly program and I must admit that
the thought of not finding a similar institution in Zurich makes me a bit
nervous, especially for my youngest. Given that our family language is English, he will only get Greek from me on a
regular basis. I know that there is so much more I could do to reinforce both the
language and the cultural aspect of learning. ometimes I’m just tired. Still,
letting go is not an option.
Children need anchors in their lives, particularly when they move around. Besides their family, awareness
and connection with the different cultures that constitute their identity can
provide that stability and continuity they need as they go through change
and transitions. So even if I don’t find that Greek school in Zurich, the “Greek
immersion programme” will continue – at home and on location, in Greece. I am also hoping my
mother will continue with her grandmotherly duties, which involve helping me
teach the little guy how to speak and read in Greek and making sure the older
ones don’t lose their skills.
My children will make their own cultural choices as
they grow up and I will have to respect them. But for the moment, they will continue
to do their Greek homework every week – and be less than thrilled at it – because
they have no choice.
I would love to hear about how you have dealt with raising children under multiple
cultural influences. What challenges did you face in doing that and how did you
cope with them?
Uncategorized

Coming of Age (or The Perfect Home – Part 2)

The Perfect Home doesn’t exist. Well, at least for
now. The good news is that there is The Home That is Perfect Enough.

I know, it
may be a bit disappointing or may feel like I’m giving up, but to me it also means
that I’m growing up (a little). Part of this coming-of-age-process involves accepting that any one poor piece of
property cannot possibly give me everything I want from a home – and I want a
lot! People who know me well – I won’t name names – were laughing out loud
after reading in last week’s post that “I am probably less flexible and more
demanding than the average home-seeker” (what’s wrong with having high
standards?) Well, the new, more mature me has decided that, as long as I am true
to my principles about what is non-negotiable – the no-compromise
areas being, in my case, that the new place should provide a minimum comfortable living space for
my family and that I can imagine us feeling at home there – I should go for the
one place that checks off most criteria on my list.
One of the houses we saw last week fits the bill. It is not huge, but comfortable enough that we won’t feel cramped. It
has a garden; not a big one, but the kids will be happy. It is
tasteful, both in the interior and the exterior, and not oppressive. It has
a lot of windows to let the light in, which is a big deal for me. There
is even a cute little office for me to write. The neighbourhood is nice, residential and close enough to the kids’ school, although – and here is my compromise – not within walking distance of the city
centre! There is a streetcar that is a relatively short walk away that
can take me there in 15-20 minutes. Not what I’ve been used to, but otherwise
it would not be a compromise, would it. In fact, I was surprised to notice that, when I discussed it with my friends, many of them did not think the distance was
such a big deal. I guess we’ll have to see.
There is also another consideration that makes me more open to compromise: as my husband correctly pointed out, given the nature
of the housing market, do we want to risk the horror scenario of being stuck, last-minute
before our move, with a choice between a relatively central but cramped little
apartment and a big house much further away than my comfort zone would allow?

I was talking to a friend this weekend about her
experience when she moved to Austria a few years ago and she said something
that made an impression on me: she said that through that experience she grew
as a person. She learned a lot about herself that she would not have found out,
had she stayed in the comfort of her home country. By confronting and overcoming the many little
and bigger challenges involved in moving into a new country and culture, she
discovered what she is capable of (a lot more than she thought) – and that felt
good. Now, I don’t believe that I have to prove anything to anyone, including
myself, but I must admit it sounds like an interesting experiment.
The fact that it can be a limited-time experiment increases
its appeal: the house is only available for a maximum
of two-and-half years, before the owners come back from an overseas assignment.
What may be off-putting for other home-seekers is a blessing in disguise
for me, because it means that I don’t need to make such a big commitment here.
So
I’ve decided to see the whole thing as a project: a time-limited, personal
development project with clear targets. I will make the mental switch and consider it a possibility rather than as a necessity; a chance to see whether I am truly
miserable if I’m not in the city or
if it’s not such a big deal to have to take public transport or drive rather
than walk. I’m thinking about how liberating that realisation would be (or it could be a huge culture shock, but at least the experiment has an expiration date). And
maybe there is some secret charm to a house with a garden? Somehow having spent
most of my childhood in one didn’t do it for me, but we were visiting some friends yesterday and their home has a garden and my children were in heaven. They did
not want to leave. They were also so busy enjoying themselves on their own, that we could have some peace and enjoy time with our friends. That’s
quality of life I would not mind having for a little bit.
Uncategorized

The Perfect Home

I just came back from the second “reconnaissance” trip
to Zurich. This one was dedicated to finding The Perfect Home. We had this
romantic notion that if we arranged to see a large enough number of potentially
suitable properties, we would find at least one – if not more – that we could imagine
as our home for the next few years. Despite having heard from various
sources that the real estate market in Zurich is tight and that large
properties are scarce, I thought, somehow, that the Perfect Home was out there
waiting for me – and that it would present itself on that trip. If anything,
yesterday’s trip taught me that (as much as hate the idea) there is no way
around compromise – but at least you get to choose what you compromise on J.
We saw many potential homes. Some were spacious and
some were cramped. Some had gardens that would have made my kids happy and others
did not. A couple of them were centrally located and others (I thought) were borderline
part of the civilised world. Remember all those criteria – from my previous
post – the ones that our perfect family home should fulfil? They were
all fulfilled – by a combination of different homes.
The most central property we saw was an apartment where
I could walk out of my door and walk into a Starbucks (I have decided that
proximity to a Starbucks or other decent café, is a benchmark of civilization,
as far as location is concerned). It was a beautifully renovated and elegant flat,
but obviously built for smaller families. My kids would have rooms, but they
would not be able to fit much of their stuff (including their clothes) in their
rooms. There was a lovely rooftop terrace that the real estate agent insisted
would add to our living space. Given that it was such a warm and sunny day
yesterday, I almost forgot that I would be able to use this terrace at most two
months a year. There was also not much in terms of parks or playgrounds, not to mention I
could forget about using my car much, since I could not park it anywhere near.
Another centrally located town house we saw had a lot
of character and charming interior design, but it had such low ceilings that my
husband bumped his head on them several times during the viewing; and so many
steep staircases that my 70-year-old mother would only come visit us once –
then never again. Not to mention, again, a space issue.
We also saw properties that were more generous in
terms of space – houses with gardens. One was beautiful, but one room short for
our needs; also not so central, but at least close to the city limits.
Another one was big enough and could fit all of us, but as we came in the front
door, we discovered, to our horror, that its owners were fans of 1970s design. The
last one we visited was just right: spacious, with enough rooms for all of us –
and then some; tasteful; with a huge garden; there was even a swimming pool. The catch: it was at the top of a hill, next to a forest.
Everything would be just a drive away.
Well, at least when the relatively steep road leading to it would not be
covered by snow or (worse) ice.
The rule is simple and it applies to most places: the
further away from the city you move, the more space you get. I had the romantic
and wildly unrealistic expectation that I would be able to find the exception
to the rule – a home that is spacious enough to fit my whole family comfortably
without being so remote that I would feel isolated – or obliged to become the
family chauffeur. I was also secretly hoping that I would enter one of those
houses and get the feeling of “homeliness” that would tell me that “it’s the one.”
It is hard to describe precisely the feeling of being at home, but most of
us know it when it’s there. That feeling is the one thing I am not willing to
compromise on, whatever we decide.
We needed to make a decision by the end of the day. I
did not want to, though, because I did not think that we had found our home
yet. I am probably less flexible and more demanding than the average home-seeker.
The terms of the compromise are clear: either we go for one of the bigger homes
and we (I, really) come to terms with living outside the city; or we compromise
on space, learning to live with a lot less stuff
(which is not such a bad idea in general), but live right where all the action
is. I’m still looking for the “third way.”
I don’t know where we will end up. I am still hoping
that the Perfect Home will show up over the next couple of weeks in one of my
daily Internet searches. Compromise may be around the corner, but I’m not going
down without a fight.
Uncategorized

Family Ties

Today would have been my
father’s 82nd birthday. My father, who passed away a bit more than three years ago, was
an impressive man. He was smart, kind and generous. He was larger than life. My
stepdaughter and our two older children were lucky to get to know “Pappous” (Greek
for grandfather) quite well. I am grateful that they were all old enough at the time to
be able to remember him now. Sadly, our youngest will not get that chance; neither
will my nephew and niece, who were also born after he passed away.
An article I read last
week got me thinking, again, about a subject that
has always occupied my mind, in relation to my choice of a “migrant” lifestyle. It
was about the benefits of growing up in an extended family – with grandparents
and great-grandparents – and all the valuable intergenerational experiences
that many of today’s children will never get to know because of their parents’
lifestyle choices.
When we decide to pursue
a “mobile” life – to become migrants – we open ourselves up to a broad range of
potential opportunities for growth and exploration, but at the same time, we give
up a certain version of family life – the kind described in the article and the
kind I grew up with. When I decided to build a life and family outside my home
country and away from my family of origin, I had a relatively good idea of what I
would be missing: I would not be there for many family milestone events; I
would miss the little things that make everyday life; I would risk becoming an “outsider”
within my own family. Then, when my parents would get older, I would not be
able to be there for them as much as I would like to. If they got sick, there
is a good chance that I would be thousands of miles away. If, or rather when, the
“dreaded phone call” would come, it might take me hours to be by their side.
When my kids were born, I
knew that they would not grow up with their grandparents being part of their
daily life. If I wanted them to have a close relationship with my parents, I
would have to make a significant effort, given the distance. Also, given that
it was very important for me that my children learn to speak my mother tongue,
proximity to their Greek grandparents would have made everything so much
easier. Not to mention how much more comfortable my life would have been with
regular – and free – babysitting!
Realising all that potential
loss, hurt a lot. Still
I went ahead and did it; I became a migrant. My parents made it easier for me
by encouraging me instead of holding me back. Now that I have children of my
own, I realise how hard it must have been for them to do that and admire them
for it.
There are times, though, when I wonder whether the price we pay is worth the benefits of the global nomad life. When my
father was sick, I did not live in the same city or even country as he did. I managed
to spend time with him on a regular basis, but I was not there for him all the
time. When the “dreaded phone call” came, I was thousands of miles away.
That said, there are also
important positive implications of choosing a globally mobile life as far as
family ties are concerned. For one, our nuclear family becomes much stronger;
its bonds become tighter and more solid, because they are often the only
constant in the midst of change. Furthermore, I believe that this life makes at least some of us more open to deeper relationships: a lot of my friends have
become my family now and I feel blessed for that.
When we make the lifestyle choice to become migrants, are we aware of
the trade-offs upfront? Do we do a Cost-Benefit analysis in our heads and if yes, how do we “weigh” the excitement of discovering new
places, cultures and people and the unlimited potential opportunities that open up versus the loss that comes from giving up part of our family? How do we
compromise and how do we cope? And is it all worth it in the end?
Have a great week!
P.S. I will be taking my Diary on another Swiss field trip on Wednesday J. See you on Thursday!
Uncategorized

The Migrant Soul

I am coming back to a
comment, or rather a question, I got on my first post: What is it that
makes us migrants? I am not talking about people who emigrate out of necessity
or in order to survive – to escape war, genocide or economic hardship – but for those who choose to leave their country and go live somewhere
else. I’ve been doing some research recently on expatriation and the reasons that make
people decide to move. The main motives seem to be linked to the search for
professional opportunities or for a better quality of life; the desire to
experience life in another country; and, of course, love J. I understand moving for love; but as far as the
other reasons are concerned, assuming there is no absolute necessity, what is
it that makes us seek another land? Yes, finding a better job or enjoying a
more comfortable lifestyle is great, but then why doesn’t everyone who feels
that need go ahead and move? What gives us that extra push to make it happen?

I believe that personal
history plays a big role. The experiences we have during our formative
childhood years – for example, how much we’ve had to move around – influence
some of the behavioural patterns that we develop. If you’ve had to leave behind your
home and your friends too often, or if you’ve had a couple of unpleasant
experiences like that, you learn not to form strong attachments to people or
places. Someone else in your situation,
however, might instead become really good and really fast at getting to know
people and making friends, because the luxury of time may not be there. Is
there a trigger that makes us go either way? I’m not sure.
Even if you
have not had a very “mobile” childhood, the “bug” of migration may be in your
system. I did not move around as a kid. If you exclude the first four years of
my life that I spent in Africa, the rest of my formative years were spent in a
stable environment: same country, same city, same school, same circle of
friends. Yet, as far as I can remember, I always wanted to live abroad when I
grow up. I wanted to experience other cultures and lifestyles; to get to know
different people; to learn their language. I remember how much I enjoyed the
experience of traveling with my family from a very young age. I loved exploring
new places and immersing myself in another life, even if it was only for a
limited time. As attached as I was to my family and as painful as I found any
kind of separation from them (going away to summer camp for a few weeks was a
huge drama every single time!), I somehow knew that I would end
up living outside my home country – ideally in many different places.

Family played a role
here – which is also part of personal history. It was not just the fact that my
parents gave me a “preview” of what’s out there and a taste for travel early on,
but also the fact that both them were migrants themselves (not by choice, but
still). My mother was born and raised in another country and only moved to
Greece as an adult, while my father went the other direction – he left Greece
when he was a teenager and spent forty
years of his life on another continent and a completely different
culture before moving back. These were my role models, whether consciously or sub-consciously.

Still, I did not have to turn out like this. I
know people with similar personal and family histories who prefer the stability and continuity of building a life, a home, a family in one place to the thrill of exploring new lands. I also know people with “stable”
childhoods and parents with similarly “non-mobile” lives who have decided that
the world is their oyster.
So there must be
something more there. Is it something that we carry within us, like a natural
curiosity or restlessness? Are those personality traits that we are born with
or do we acquire them as a result of our history?
Maybe it is the fact that it
has become so easy to move and to keep alive our bonds with the loved ones we
leave behind, that we hesitate less in taking the plunge?
Or is it that once we
move away from home the first time there is no way back?
Today’s topic is a
little more philosophical than usual, but I look forward to hearing your
thoughts.

P.S. Sure enough, right after I published this post, it occurred to me to look up the title I chose. It turns out that “My Migrant Soul” is a 2001 movie by Yasmine Kabir. Also there is a book by Avi Shafran called “Migrant Soul.” So much for originality J